Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a vital diagnostic tool used by radiologists, and image quality is heavily dependent on the performance of radiofrequency (RF) coils. RF coils are important components of MRI scanners as they influence signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which is crucial for high-quality MRI images. However, coupling, magnetic field interference between coils, can degrade image quality, which may lead to inaccurate identification of cancerous tumors or damaged tissue. Currently, decoupling strategies such as critical coil overlap are employed to minimize coupling, but critical overlap is unrealistic and difficult to attain, and optimal conditions for decoupling remain understudied. Therefore, I aimed to develop a novel decoupling strategy to improve MRI image quality and resolution in a 2-channel RF coil array. I constructed a large decoupling loop, 15 cm by 7 cm, and a small decoupling loop, 11 cm by 6.5 cm; both designed to completely cover the overlap of a 2-channel RF coil array. The SNR was assessed after image acquisition in a 3T MRI scanner. My findings suggest that the large and small decoupling loop sufficiently decoupled RF coils, achieving a high maximum SNR of 492.7 and 445.2 respectively. Overall, these findings suggest that both decoupling loops can minimize coupling and improve image quality in MRI. Future research should explore decoupling strategies for increased RF coil channels and investigate their applicability with human subjects.

References

• B. Malone, J. Ruff, J. Hou, C. Bauer, and S. M. Wright, “A Novel Voltage Controlled Decoupling Method for Trans mit Coils in MRI,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, pp. 1–5, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340276
• Y. Sun, M. Wang, J. Du, W. Wang, G. Yang, W. Wang, and Q. Ren, “16-channel sleeve antenna array based on passive decoupling method at 14 T,” Journal of magnetic resonance, vol. 369, Article e107796, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107796
• O. Dietrich, J. G. Raya, S. B. Reeder, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg, “Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 375-385, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20969
• C. Pan, J. Chen, and J. Benesty, “On intrusive speech quality measures and a global SNR based metric,” Speech Communication, vol. 158, Article e103044, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2024.103044
• Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, X. Kong, P. Zeng, H. Yin, J. Wu, Y. U. A. Heide, M. Frantzen-Steneker, E. Astreinidou, M. E. Nowee, and P. J. Houdt. “MRI basics for radiation oncologists,” Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, vol. 18, pp. 74-79., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ctro.2019.04.008
• S. Jaga and K. R. Devi, “Brain tumor classification utilizing Triple Memristor Hopfield Neural Network optimized with Northern Goshawk Optimization for MRI image,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 95, Article e106450, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bspc.2024.106450
• T. Nam, D. Kim, D. Hernandez, T. Lee, Y. Noh, and K. Kim, “Geometric decoupling using clip-path conductors for whole-brain transceiver array at 7T,” Measurement, vol. 220, Article e113373, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. measurement.2023.113373
• N. Rutsch, P. Amrein, A. K. Exadaktylos, L. M. Benneker, F. Schmaranzer, M. Müller, C. E. Albers, and S. F. Bigdon, “Cervical spine trauma – Evaluating the diagnostic power of CT, MRI, X-Ray and LODOX,” Injury, vol. 54, no. 7, Article e110771, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.in jury.2023.05.003
• K. Dedushi, F. Hyseni, J. Musa, K. Saliaj, V. Vokshi, A. Guy, A. Bhatti, I. Ahmetgjekaj, M. Tahir, and J. Shatri, “Importance of MRI in the diagnosis of a rare intracranial mucocele associated with frontal paranasal osteoma: Case report and literature review, ”Radiology Case Reports, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3094-3098, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.07.038
• M. C. Fernandes, M. J. Gollub, and G. Brown, “The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation,” Surgical Oncology, 43, Article e101739, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101739
• N. Hironaga, T. Kimura, T. Mitsudo, A. Gunji, and M. Iwa ta, “Proposal for an accurate TMS-MRI co-registration process via 3D laser scanning,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 144, pp. 30-39, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neures.2018.08.012
• A. Parakh and T. Tirkes, “Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis,” Abdominal radiology (New York), vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1420–1438, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02191-0
• W. Kwok, “Basic principles of and practical guide to clinical MRI radiofrequency coils,” Radiographics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 898-918, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.210110
• Y. Liu, Q. Wang, and F. Liu, “A hybrid 2D-FDTD/3D-MoM method used for the analysis of MRI RF coils,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 106, pp. 77-84, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2023.11.005
• He, and Z. Xu, “Improving local SNR of a single-channel 54.6 mT MRI system using additional LC-resonator,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 339, Article e107215, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107215
• T. Tritrakarn, M. Takahashi, and T. Okamura, “Optimization of RF coil geometry for NMR/MRI applications using a genetic algorithm,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 362, Article e107685, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmr.2024.107685
• R. W. Jones and R. J. Witte, “Signal intensity artifacts in clinical MR imaging,” Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 893–901, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma19893
• L. I. N. Lara, J. P. Stockmann, Q. Meng, B. Keil, A. Mar eyam, I. Uluç, M. Daneshzand, S. Makarov, L. L. Wald, and A. Nummenmaa, “A novel whole-head RF coil design tailored for concurrent multichannel brain stimulation and imaging at 3T,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1021 1031, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.05.025
• M. Lu, J. C. Gore, and X. Yan, “Over-overlapped loop arrays: A numerical study,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 72, pp. 135-142, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2020.07.006